<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sam Sparro - Complex or Confused? (Part I of II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/</link>
	<description>music.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Black and Gold is a FANTASTIC song. I'm an student of Christian apologetics, so the lyrics carry special significance to me, as well as for anyone who's ever asked, "God, are you there?"
For quite a while I listened to it without paying any attention at all to the lyrics, along with all the other songs tagged "Electronic" I downloaded off the 'net. I really didn't know what I had. Then when I finally started paying attention, it hit me like a truck. This song is wrestling with some heavy, HEAVY stuff, the kind of question that for the most part stays out of the -- forgive me -- shallow world of pop music.

If life is an accident, does MY existence have any significance at all? If mortal life is all there is, and my life only matters if it influences the course of future events, how do I know those future events matter? Does anything at all have any significance whatsoever outside of the Divine? Moreover, can scientific fact disprove the existence of a being who must necessarily exist beyond the realm of the scientifically testable?

'cause if you're not really here
then the stars don't even matter
now i'm filled to the top with fear
but it's all just a bunch of matter

If this feeling of "something beyond them" is nothing more than an illusion, then do I even have free will? If there is no God, I have no soul, and am no more than "just  bunch of matter." "Just a bunch of matter" is controlled only by it's previous state of being, it's every change and action determined from the first instant of the Big Bang, therefore free will is no more than a cruel trick. But what is cruelty? By who's standard is it judged? Is consensus of opinion the only source of Moral Law, barring a Divine Standard? Can there be ANY morality AT ALL under such circumstances? Why should Mankind's collective morality be regarded as sacred? What is Mankind but "just a bunch of matter"? There can be NO MORALITY barring the existence of Deity.

And finally, the great grieving, driving conclusion: isn't nonbeing preferable to such a pathetic shell of an existence? After all, what is existence? What am I but a particular arrangement of "a bunch of matter" that shall continue to change and evolve. If consciousness is nothing but an intermittent state between Oblivion and Oblivion, why not hasten that final, empty state of nonbeing, and speed the dominion of the only force worthy of worship, barring God Himself: Entropy the All-Devouring, the Force that ultimately foils all of mankind's grand schemes. (rhetorical)

Each question flowing from the next, if ONLY people would stop long enough to THINK! Forgive me, I digress.

Overall, an absolutely ASTOUNDING piece of work. I only wish that more people struggled with these greatest of questions, gained a little perspective on existence, and gained Hope that these is something more, Someone more to everything that we understand and wonder about. Gay or not, and no matter where he is in his (or isn't) in his faith walk, Sam Sparro has earned a great deal of respect from me, and may God bless him richly in his search for answers.

tl;dr version:
Good song, big questions, such as many found here:
www.reasonablefaith.org
God bless you all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black and Gold is a FANTASTIC song. I&#8217;m an student of Christian apologetics, so the lyrics carry special significance to me, as well as for anyone who&#8217;s ever asked, &#8220;God, are you there?&#8221;<br />
For quite a while I listened to it without paying any attention at all to the lyrics, along with all the other songs tagged &#8220;Electronic&#8221; I downloaded off the &#8216;net. I really didn&#8217;t know what I had. Then when I finally started paying attention, it hit me like a truck. This song is wrestling with some heavy, HEAVY stuff, the kind of question that for the most part stays out of the &#8212; forgive me &#8212; shallow world of pop music.</p>
<p>If life is an accident, does MY existence have any significance at all? If mortal life is all there is, and my life only matters if it influences the course of future events, how do I know those future events matter? Does anything at all have any significance whatsoever outside of the Divine? Moreover, can scientific fact disprove the existence of a being who must necessarily exist beyond the realm of the scientifically testable?</p>
<p>&#8217;cause if you&#8217;re not really here<br />
then the stars don&#8217;t even matter<br />
now i&#8217;m filled to the top with fear<br />
but it&#8217;s all just a bunch of matter</p>
<p>If this feeling of &#8220;something beyond them&#8221; is nothing more than an illusion, then do I even have free will? If there is no God, I have no soul, and am no more than &#8220;just  bunch of matter.&#8221; &#8220;Just a bunch of matter&#8221; is controlled only by it&#8217;s previous state of being, it&#8217;s every change and action determined from the first instant of the Big Bang, therefore free will is no more than a cruel trick. But what is cruelty? By who&#8217;s standard is it judged? Is consensus of opinion the only source of Moral Law, barring a Divine Standard? Can there be ANY morality AT ALL under such circumstances? Why should Mankind&#8217;s collective morality be regarded as sacred? What is Mankind but &#8220;just a bunch of matter&#8221;? There can be NO MORALITY barring the existence of Deity.</p>
<p>And finally, the great grieving, driving conclusion: isn&#8217;t nonbeing preferable to such a pathetic shell of an existence? After all, what is existence? What am I but a particular arrangement of &#8220;a bunch of matter&#8221; that shall continue to change and evolve. If consciousness is nothing but an intermittent state between Oblivion and Oblivion, why not hasten that final, empty state of nonbeing, and speed the dominion of the only force worthy of worship, barring God Himself: Entropy the All-Devouring, the Force that ultimately foils all of mankind&#8217;s grand schemes. (rhetorical)</p>
<p>Each question flowing from the next, if ONLY people would stop long enough to THINK! Forgive me, I digress.</p>
<p>Overall, an absolutely ASTOUNDING piece of work. I only wish that more people struggled with these greatest of questions, gained a little perspective on existence, and gained Hope that these is something more, Someone more to everything that we understand and wonder about. Gay or not, and no matter where he is in his (or isn&#8217;t) in his faith walk, Sam Sparro has earned a great deal of respect from me, and may God bless him richly in his search for answers.</p>
<p>tl;dr version:<br />
Good song, big questions, such as many found here:<br />
<a href="http://www.reasonablefaith.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.reasonablefaith.org</a><br />
God bless you all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lacey</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>lacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-134</guid>
		<description>omg hees gay i think his music is really good ;d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg hees gay i think his music is really good ;d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisavet</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisavet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-103</guid>
		<description>wow this was so interesting to read, I have read in previous reviews about his religious side, but the point is that when I personally listen to the album and in particular Black and Gold, all I hear is a love song! Maybe it is love to God, but I see and hear it as love to another person. 

As for his music, it is very much influenced by soul and gospel and jazz, on top of the disco, funk and electronica. It's a great sound!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow this was so interesting to read, I have read in previous reviews about his religious side, but the point is that when I personally listen to the album and in particular Black and Gold, all I hear is a love song! Maybe it is love to God, but I see and hear it as love to another person. </p>
<p>As for his music, it is very much influenced by soul and gospel and jazz, on top of the disco, funk and electronica. It&#8217;s a great sound!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippin</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 08:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-95</guid>
		<description>It's quite possible to be gay and Christian/have spirituality. It just depends on what faith/christian denomination you associate with if any at all, and how you interpret/read/understand your beliefs etc. All Christians interpret their scriptures to some extent, or else they'd still be calling people who eat shellfish "abominations" as this proclamations sits alongside the one about men sleeping with men being an abomination in the Bible (book of Leviticus).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite possible to be gay and Christian/have spirituality. It just depends on what faith/christian denomination you associate with if any at all, and how you interpret/read/understand your beliefs etc. All Christians interpret their scriptures to some extent, or else they&#8217;d still be calling people who eat shellfish &#8220;abominations&#8221; as this proclamations sits alongside the one about men sleeping with men being an abomination in the Bible (book of Leviticus).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anstey</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Anstey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Oh, Hello again, sorry i don't mean to intend to bombard you with comments, i promise this is the last. I'm English, forgive me!

Above you mention the resemblance between the dove in the logo and the bird in sam's name on the CD cover. Now, obviously no-one can prove it, but i would be inclined to say that that would be more likely to be a sparrow (because of the name) rather than a dove.

Good research though, I see what may have led you to consider that. But yea, that's my opinion. sparrow not dove. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Hello again, sorry i don&#8217;t mean to intend to bombard you with comments, i promise this is the last. I&#8217;m English, forgive me!</p>
<p>Above you mention the resemblance between the dove in the logo and the bird in sam&#8217;s name on the CD cover. Now, obviously no-one can prove it, but i would be inclined to say that that would be more likely to be a sparrow (because of the name) rather than a dove.</p>
<p>Good research though, I see what may have led you to consider that. But yea, that&#8217;s my opinion. sparrow not dove. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anstey</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Anstey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Sorry, just a quick point...

"And then of course there’s the line that hangs in the air like a giant white question-mark-shaped cloud: If vision is the only validation, then most of my life isn’t real. Yikes. Does this mean that because Sparro is unable to see God himself, he is unable to validate his beliefs? And that he considers God, or the idea of God, to be most of his life?"

Yea ok, good reasoning, but i see that to mean that whist people say that seeing is believing, if that were true then most of my life wouldn't be real, as opposed to he can't see god. 

And VERY quickly in reference to the gay thing, yea, so he's gay, yea so being gay is a sin but it's no worse than any other sin, the bible's quite clear on that, it makes him no less of a christian that you or I. what makes the difference is what he chooses to do with that. some people are genetically gay, we live in a fallen world, these things happen, but he can either ignore that and stay clean as it were or he can choose to follow that and satisfy his desires by actually having a relationship with  another man.

Feel free to argue with me, but I'm in the least arrogant way intended, i am very sure that I'm right.

God Bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, just a quick point&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;And then of course there’s the line that hangs in the air like a giant white question-mark-shaped cloud: If vision is the only validation, then most of my life isn’t real. Yikes. Does this mean that because Sparro is unable to see God himself, he is unable to validate his beliefs? And that he considers God, or the idea of God, to be most of his life?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yea ok, good reasoning, but i see that to mean that whist people say that seeing is believing, if that were true then most of my life wouldn&#8217;t be real, as opposed to he can&#8217;t see god. </p>
<p>And VERY quickly in reference to the gay thing, yea, so he&#8217;s gay, yea so being gay is a sin but it&#8217;s no worse than any other sin, the bible&#8217;s quite clear on that, it makes him no less of a christian that you or I. what makes the difference is what he chooses to do with that. some people are genetically gay, we live in a fallen world, these things happen, but he can either ignore that and stay clean as it were or he can choose to follow that and satisfy his desires by actually having a relationship with  another man.</p>
<p>Feel free to argue with me, but I&#8217;m in the least arrogant way intended, i am very sure that I&#8217;m right.</p>
<p>God Bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friday Writers&#8217; Bloc: May 16th, 2008 &#171; idk.</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>The Friday Writers&#8217; Bloc: May 16th, 2008 &#171; idk.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] nearly the same quality, Munroe already reminds me a little bit of a more raw, less developed Sam Sparro. One other thing: Munroe even upstages Usher&#8217;s remix in one sense &#8212; he actually made an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nearly the same quality, Munroe already reminds me a little bit of a more raw, less developed Sam Sparro. One other thing: Munroe even upstages Usher&#8217;s remix in one sense &#8212; he actually made an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Sparro - Complex or Confused? (Part II of II) &#171; idk.</title>
		<link>http://idknada.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sam-sparro-complex-or-confused-part-i-of-ii/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Sparro - Complex or Confused? (Part II of II) &#171; idk.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idknada.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] read last week&#8217;s post, &#8220;Sam Sparro - Complex or Confused? Part I of II,&#8221; click here to backtrack to it before reading Part II [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read last week&#8217;s post, &#8220;Sam Sparro - Complex or Confused? Part I of II,&#8221; click here to backtrack to it before reading Part II [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
